Estudio Bazán Estudio Bazán Estudio Bazán

VERDICTS IN FAVOUR OF CLIENTS OF ESTUDIO BAZAN MARTOS AT INDECOPI

RESOLUCION Nº 925-1999/TPI-INDECOPI

Controversy between brand M'CKLEIN 2000 PAUL requested by our client and the brand CALVIN KLEIN, both for class 25 of the official nomenclature. Brand Paul M`CKLEIN was allowed to register.

RESOLUCION Nº 2476-2008/TPI-INDECOPI  

Controversy between the trademark "THE chimbotana" owned by our client Pesquera Conservas de Chimbote – La Chimbotana SAC, to distinguish economic activities in Class 29 of the International Classification Vs. the trademarks applying for registration "The chimbotana and logo", "The chimbotana and Design", to distinguish goods in Class 29 of the International Classification, view records N ° 320838-2007 and 318240-2007.

RESOLUCION Nº 899-2000/TPI-INDECOPI  

Our client Creaciones Tiburón y Alondra Huayna Hermanos S.A applied for registration of the trademark “TIBURON and the image of a shark coming out of the waves" to distinguish underwear in general for Class 25 of the International Classification, a claim denied at first, as it was considered confusingly similar to the trademark "TIBURON" to distinguish shoes and slippers in Class 25 of the International Classification. In a second session, the Chamber Court of Indecopi judged that there is no risk of confusion between the two signs in dispute, therefore granting finally the registration of the trademark our client applied for.

RESOLUCION Nº 2055-2010/TPI-INDECOPI  

Controversy between the graphic logo    requested by our client King Run E.I.R.L., and the brand CALÇADOS AZALEIA  ; both in the same category 25. Nonetheless, the superior court of INDECOPI decided to issue a permit for the registration of the logo of our client.

RESOLUCION Nº 1345-2001/TPI-INDECOPI  

 Controversy between brands and logo owned by ADIDAS- SALOMON AG vs. LOMA'S and logo (brand owned by our client Isabel Cristina Colan Chapeyiquen), both to distinguish goods in Class 25 of the International Classification, file No. 98954-2000. The Court of Competition and Intellectual Property declared the action for annulation of certificate No. 2912 (LOMA'S brand and logo), unfounded.

RESOLUCION Nº 0963-2009/SC1-INDECOPI  

The Resolution 031-2009/CEB-INDE3COPI of February 5, 2009 is abolished and the complaint filed by our client COMPAÑÍA INDUSTRIAL LIMA S.A. – CILSA vs. the urban municipality of Lima and the municipality of Puente Piedra declared justified, because the proceeding of the Metropolitan Municipality of Lima, consisting of issuing a “non- compatibility of use certificate” to CILSA, represents an illegal bureaucratic barrier. Furthermore, it is stated that CILSA is entitled to obtain a Certificate of Use rated compatible, with the specification to refer only to the oil recovery activity. The conduct of the Metropolitan Municipality of Lima implies an ignorance of the CILSA operating license and thus, of the investment guarantees that authorization grants its holder.

RESOLUCION Nº 0169-2004/TPI-INDECOPI

Our client John Belline Ramirez Flores applied for registration of the trademark consisting of the product label "VELITAS VOTIVAS J.R. LA MISIONERA" to distinguish candles intended exclusively to religious ceremonies and candles in general in class 04 of the International Classification, a claim which Carlos Humberto Collazos Salazar, holder of the product brand "MISIONERA y etiqueta" to distinguish products d class 04 Official Nomenclature, opposed. The Court Chamber of Indecopi judged that there is NO likelihood of confusion between the signs in dispute, GRANTING the registration of the trademark our client applied for.

Av. Javier Prado Este 2955 Of. 203 -San Borja - Lima 41 - Perú (Ref. Entre Av. San Luis y Av. Rosa Toro)
Tel.: (511) 346-2660 / 346-2652 - Cel.:(511)999 765 246 / RPM *432003 / Claro 987 129 653
E-mail: info@estudiobazan.com.pe / jbazan_m@hotmail.com